28 September 2010
Further to the most recent post, concerning the Bristol stadium and regeneration fake village green case, a comment was received from Julie (no surname given). It is worth re-printing in its entirety:
Please let me make certain that I understand what has happened here.
Thousands of local people want the stadium and the regeneration.
The democratically elected council wants the stadium and the regeneration.
The landowner wants the stadium and the regeneration.
But some dog walkers have gone onto the person's land, as trespassers, so their dogs can c**p on that person's property.
Then some inspector or other says that claims of suchlike activities make the property a village green.
The owner's property is then effectively confiscated.
Sorry, but this is not the England that I was born into.
Note: the picture is of a real village green. This genuine one is at Wisborough, in Sussex
27 September 2010
The City of Bristol's proud regeneration plans, including one of the modern stadiums for England's football World Cup bid, lie in ruins.
Democratic, transparent and fully accountable, this proposed regeneration scheme had already achieved the necessary planning permission. This is no mean feat.
But then a few unaccountable activists, wanting to preserve 'their' views (and their nice middle-class house prices) resorted to the now familiar tactic of claiming that somebody else's privately-owned property is a 'village green'. By doing so, they have caused utter chaos and halted the local regeneration.
The damage to jobs and the hard-pressed local economy by the claim in this case is estimated at from £90 million to £300 million, according to whose calculation you prefer.
Here are a few key issues highlighted by this latest perversion of the village green laws of England. The so-called 'village green' in question here is:
- 42 acres. Many complete villages in England don't amount to 42 acres in area, never mind their local (ancient and genuine) village green.
- Going to be registered (as things currently stand) on the basis of only 22 people who gave verbal statements about the 'village green' claim.
- Recommended for registration as a 'village green' despite the people who gave verbal statements not being placed under oath or any similar warning.
- Supported by the non-statutory 'independent' inspector in this case, Ms Ross Crail. Ms Crail acted in support of the Ramblers Association in their most prominent recent case. Among other things, the Ramblers Association promotes public access to privately-owned property.